An activation function is an arbitrary, nonlinear,scalar function $f: \mathbb{R}^d \rightarrow \mathbb{R}$. In the existing work on robustness certification, such bounds have been computed using human ingenuity for a handful of the most popular activation functions. While a number of heuristics have been proposed for bounding arbitrary functions,no analysis of the tightness optimality for general scalar functions has been offered yet, to the best of our knowledge. We fill this gap by formulating a concise optimality criterion for tightness of the approximation which allows us tobuild optimal bounds for any function convex in the region of interest $R$. Fora more general class of functions Lipshitz-continuous in $R$ we propose a sampling-based approach (SOL) which, given an instance of the bounding problem, efficiently computes the tightest linear bounds within a given $\varepsilon > 0$ threshold. We leverage an adaptive sampling technique to iteratively build a setof sample points suitable for representing the target activation function.

An activation function is an arbitrary, nonlinear,scalar function f: \mathbb{R} d \rightarrow \mathbb{R} . In the existing work on robustness certification, such bounds have been computed using human ingenuity for a handful of the most popular activation functions. While a number of heuristics have been proposed for bounding arbitrary functions,no analysis of the tightness optimality for general scalar functions has been offered yet, to the best of our knowledge. We fill this gap by formulating a concise optimality criterion for tightness of the approximation which allows us tobuild optimal bounds for any function convex in the region of interest R . Fora more general class of functions Lipshitz-continuous in R we propose a sampling-based approach (SOL) which, given an instance of the bounding problem, efficiently computes the tightest linear bounds within a given \varepsilon 0 threshold.